Recipes / Dev & code
Multi-agentWorkflowDev & code

The writer never reviews its own lane

A fleet rule: whichever model wrote a piece of work never reviews it; a different vendor's agents review every lane, and repeated failure forces a redesign.

Setup time10 min
CostMultiple subscriptions
RunsPer change
NeedsTwo or more agents from different vendors
Last updated2026-10-15
XSource

The rule that makes my agent fleet trustworthy

by Randy Northrup (@starsoldier420) · 2026-10-07

✓ Opened via the X API on 2026-10-15

Read the original ↗
Part 1 · What the source did

A fleet rule: whichever model wrote a piece of work never reviews it; a different vendor's agents review every lane, and repeated failure forces a redesign.

  • Muse and Codex agents build; Grok agents review every lane.
  • A third failed review triggers a redesign instead of another patch.
“the model that writes a lane never reviews it”— Randy Northrup (@starsoldier420), X

Summary written by Agent Cookbook. See the original for the full context.

Part 2 · Our copy-paste version

Adapted by us from what the source described. Fill in the [BRACKETS].

The prompt

REVIEWER (different model than the author): You did not write this. Review lane [NAME] against its spec [FILE]. Return PASS or FAIL with numbered reasons. This is review #[N]. If N = 3 and still FAIL, don't suggest patches: write a one-paragraph redesign proposal instead.
🛡
Approval ruleNothing merges without a PASS from a non-author model and your sign-off.

Set it up

  1. Label each work item with its author model.
  2. Route reviews to a different vendor.
  3. Track the review count per item.

Common failures

⚠
What usually goes wrong
  • Same-model reviewers rubber-stamp shared blind spots.
  • Endless patch loops without the 3-strike rule.

Variations

  • Use Grok Bot as reviewer for Claude Code work.
  • Apply to docs and specs, not just code.

Related recipes